by : Ven. K. Sri Dhammananda.
One should not judge the
purity or impurity of man simply by observing what he eats.
In the Amagandha Sutta, the Buddha said:
“Neither
meat, nor fasting, nor nakedness,
Nor
shaven heads, nor matted hair, nor dirt,
Nor
rough skins, nor fire-worshipping,
Nor
all the penances here in this world,
Nor
hymns, nor oblation, nor sacrifice,
Nor
feasts of the season,
Will
purify a man overcome with doubt.”
Taking
fish and meat by itself does not make a man become impure. A man makes himself
impure by bigotry, deceit, envy, self-exaltation, disparagement and other evil
intentions. Through his own evil thoughts and actions, man makes himself
impure. There is no strict rule in Buddhism that the followers of the Buddha
should not take fish and meat. The only advice given by the Buddha is that they
should not be involved in killing intentionally or they should not ask others
to kill any living being for them. However, those who take vegetable food and
abstain from animal flesh are praiseworthy.
Though
the Buddha did not advocate vegetarianism for the monks, He did advise the
monks to avoid taking ten kinds of meat for their self respect and protection.
They are: humans, elephants, horses, dogs, snakes, lions, tigers, leopards,
bears hyenas. Some animals attack people when they smell the flesh of their own
kind. (Vinaya Pitaka)
When
the Buddha was asked to introduce vegetarianism amongst His disciples, the
Buddha refused to do so. As Buddhism is a free religion, His advice was to
leave the decision regarding vegetarianism to the individual disciple. It
clearly shows that the Buddha had not considered this as a very important
religious observance. The Buddha did not mention anything about vegetarianism
for the lay Buddhists in His Teaching.
Jivaka
Komarabhacca, the doctor, discussed this controversial issue with the Buddha:
‘Lord, I have heard that animals are slaughtered on purpose for the recluse
Gotama, and that the recluse Gotama knowingly eats the meat killed on purpose
for him. Lord, do those who say animals are slaughtered on purpose for the
recluse Gotama, and the recluse Gotama knowingly eats the meat killed on
purpose for. Do they falsely accuse the Buddha? Or do they speak the truth? Are
your declaration and supplementary declarations not thus subject to be
ridiculed by others in any manner?’
‘Jivaka,
those who say: ‘Animals are slaughtered on purpose for the recluse Gotama, and
the recluse Gotama knowingly eats the meat killed on purpose for him’, do not
say according to what I have declared, and they falsely accuse me. Jivaka, I
have declared that one should not make use of meat it is seen, heard or
suspected to have been killed on purpose for a monk. I allow the monks meat
that is quite pure in three respects: if it is not seen, heard or suspected to
have been killed on purpose for a monk.’ (Jivaka Sutta)
In
certain countries, the followers of the Mahayana school of Buddhism are strict
vegetarians. While appreciating their observance in the name of religion, we
should like to point out that they should not condemn those who are not
vegetarians. They must remember that there is no precept in the original
Teachings of the Buddha that requires all Buddhists to be vegetarians. We must
realize that Buddhism is known as the Middle Path. It is a liberal religion and
the Buddha’s advice was that it is not necessary to go to extremes to practise
His Teachings.
Vegetarianism
alone does not help a man to cultivate his humane qualities. There are kind,
humble, polite and religious people amongst non-vegetarians. Therefore, one
should not condone the statement that a pure, religious man must practise
vegetarianism.
On
the other hand, if anybody thinks that people cannot have a healthy life
without taking fish and meat, it does not necessarily follow that they are
correct since there are millions of pure vegetarians all over the world who are
stronger and healthier than the meat-eaters.
People
who criticize Buddhists who eat meat do not understand the Buddhist attitude
towards food. A living being needs nourishment. We eat to live. As such a human
being should supply his body with the food it needs to keep him healthy and to
give him energy to work. However, as a result of increasing wealth, more and
more people, especially in developed countries, eat simply to satisfy their
palates. If one craves after any kind of food, or kills to satisfy his greed
for meat, this is wrong. But if one eats without greed and without directly
being involved in the act of killing but merely to sustain the physical body,
he is practising self restraint.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar